Non Penal Policy to Reduce The Rate of Narcotics Crime Through a Double Track System

Januar Rahadian Mahendra

doi:10.28932/di.v15i2.7888

Authors

Januar Rahadian Mahendra Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v15i2.7888

Keywords:

Double Track System, Narcotics, Non-Penal Policy

Abstract

This research will analyze the problems contained in the implementation of the double track system for narcotics crimes using Lawrence M. Friedman's legal system theory. The author uses normative legal research with a conceptual approach and deductive method accompanied by supporting data to produce a comprehensive and critical analysis to answer the problem. The purpose of this research is to find problems in the use of the double track system in narcotics crimes using Friedman's legal system theory, this is done because in Friedman's legal system theory will divide through three aspects, namely legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture in narcotics crimes. Based on the results of the research, the legal substance problem in narcotics crime is the existence of strict liability which can cause overcriminalization so that depenalization, decriminalization, and diversion policies are needed in the Narcotics Law. In addition, there is a tendency for judges in deciding narcotics cases to only use imprisonment without accompanying it with rehabilitation. In the legal structure, there are problems in the form of a lack of drug rehabilitation facilities, the strong retributive influence so that imprisonment is the main answer in dealing with problems, abuse of power committed by law enforcers, and imprisonment which is a criminogenic factor for narcotics crimes. While the problems in legal culture are stigmatization by the community, the need for confidentiality of identity, the influence of the surrounding environment, and the level of education and employment affect the incidence of drug crimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Ancel, Marc. Social Defence: A Modern Approach to Criminal Problems. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.

Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York, Russel Sage Foundation, 1987.

Gray, Anthony. The Evolution from Strict Liability to Fault in the Law of Torts. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021.

Hoefnagels, G. Peter. The Other Side of Criminology: An Inversion of the Concept of Crime. New York, Springer Science & Business Media, 1973.

Kholiq, Abdul. Buku Pedoman Kuliah Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2002.

Marpaung, Leden. Tindak Pidana Terhadap Nyawa dan Tubuh. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2005.

Muladi and Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung, Alumni, 1992.

Nonet, Philippe, Philip Selznick and Robert A. Kagan. Law & Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Routledge, 2017.

Ravena, Dey and Kristian. Kebijakan Kriminal (Criminal Policy). Bandung, Prenadamedia, 2017.

Romli, Atmasasmita. Asas-Asas Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta, Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia, 1989.

Journals

Ali, Mahrus. “Overcriminalization dalam Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 3, No. 25, 2018, pp. 450-471, https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss3.art2.

Azmi, Alia Ashrani, et al. “Drug Addicts: Psychosocial Factor Contributing to Relapse.” MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 150, EDP Sciences, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005097.

Bintang, Cantika Ramadhani, and Ermania Widjajanti. "Peran Jaksa terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Golongan I dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Studi Kasus pada Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Bogor)." AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2024, pp. 939-956, https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v4i02.4995

Buchhandler-Raphael, Michael. “Overcriminalizing Speech.” Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2015, pp. 1669-1737, https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1540&context=wlufac.

Hammarlund, Rebecca, et al. “Review of the Effects of Self-Stigma and Perceived Social Stigma on the Treatment-Seeking Decisions of Individuals with Drug and Alchohol use Disorders.” Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, 2018, pp. 115-136, https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S183256.

Hasibuan, Edi Saputra and Amalia Syauket, “Efforts to Eradicate Narcotics in The National Police: A Case Study of Teddy Minahasa.” International Journal of Social Service and Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2023, pp. 900-905, https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i4.346.

Jamaludin, Ahmad. “Kebiri Kimia Sebagai Sanksi Tindakan dalam Double Track System.” ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2021, pp. 179-196, https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v15i2.13910.

Mahendra, J. Rahadian and N. Nurviani. “The Criminal Liability of Sea Freight Forwading Services in Transito Narcotics Crimes.” Wacana Hukum, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2024, pp. 17-34, https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v30i1.9877

Mahmud, Muhamad Isra. “Peran Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi (Studi Terhadap Kejahatan Korupsi yang dilakukan oleh Kader Politik).” Lex Renaissance, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2020, pp. 767-779, https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss4.art1.

Nurmantyo, Carto. “Reconstruction of the Criminal Sanction Policy and Action (Double Track System) in Law Enforcement For Narcotic Crime Prevention Reffered to Religious Justice.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2018, pp. 339-351, http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v5i3.3756.

Perrone, Dina, et al. “Harm Reducing Policing: An Evaluation of Law Enforcment Assisted Diversion (LEAD) in San Francisco.” Police Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2022, pp. 7-32, https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211037585.

Russoniello, Kellen, et al. “Decriminalization of Drug Possession in Oregon: Analysis and Early Lessons.” Drug Science, Policy, and Law, Vol. 9, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/20503245231167407.

Sabarinah. “Use of Drug Treatment and Rehabilitation Services in Indonesia: Findings of the 2014 National Narcotic Survey.” Asia Pasific Journal of Public Health, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2019, pp. 548-558, https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539519872343.

Sarwini, M and Riza Alfianto K. “Rehabilitation of Narcotics Addicts as the Rights to Health.” International Conference on Law, Governance and Globalization 2017 (ICLGG 2017) Atlantis Press, Vol. 131, 2017, pp. 250-263, 10.2991/iclgg-17.2018.34.

Sembiring, Hary Jackson, et al. “Efektivitas Pusat Rehabilitasi Terhadap Pecandu Narkoba di Kota Medan Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 (Studi Kasus di Panti Yuami Medan).” Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2022, pp. 167-188, https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v4i2.211.

Situmorang, Victorio H.. R. Ham and J. H. R. S. Kav. “Lembaga Pemasyarakatan sebagai Bagian dari Penegakan Hukum.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2019, pp. 85-98, http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.V13.85-98.

Stevens, Alex, et al. “Depenalization, Diversion and Decriminalization: A Realist Review and Progamme Theory of Alternatives to Criminalization for Simple Drug Possesion.” European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 19, No.1, 2022, pp. 29-54, https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819887514.

Sugiarto, “Penjatuhan Pidana oleh Hakim Terhadap Prajurit Tentara Nasional Indonesia sebagai Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), Vol. 7, No. 2, 2018, pp. 165-176, https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i02.p03

Sumanto, Atet. “Efektivitas Pidana Mati dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Perspektif: Kajian Masalah Hukum Dan Pembangunan, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2017, pp. 21-31, https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v22i1.548.

Syuhada, Qory Amalia, et al. “Application of Integrated Assesment in Handling Narcotics Abuse Cases Involving Child Offenders.” Jurnal Hukum DE’RECHTSSTAAT, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2024, pp. 83-95, https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v10i1.8914

Wibisana, Andri G. “The Many Daces od Strict Liability in Indonesia’s Wildfire Litigation.” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2019, pp 185-196, https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12284.

Wulandari, Cahya. “Kebijakan Kriminal Non Penal dengan Techno Prevention (Analisis Pencegahan Konten Negatif Melalui Internet).” Pandecta Research Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2020, pp. 228-241, https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i2.23650.

Thesis

Deniardi, Muhammad. Penerapan Double Track System dalam Pemidanaan Anak. Thesis Faculty of Law Hasanudin University, Makassar, 2013.

Law and Regulations

Undang-undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika (LNRI Tahun 2009 Nomor 143, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 5062).

Online Resources

Badan Pusat Statistik. Statistik Kriminal 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik, November 24, 2023, https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2022/11/30/4022d3351bf3a05aa6198065/statistik-kriminal-2022.html.

Deputi Bidang Rehabiltasi Badan Narkotika Nasional. “Rencana Strategis 2020-2024: Indeks Layanan Rehabilitasi Berkelanjutan.” Deputi Bidang Rehabilitasi Badan Narkotika Nasional, 25 November 2023, https://ppid.bnn.go.id/konten/unggahan/2020/10/Rencana-Strategis-Deputi-Bidang-Rehabilitasi-Tahun-2020-2024.pdf.

Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan. “Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan 2022.” Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan, 25 November 2023, http://www.ditjenpas.go.id/laporan-kinerja-direktorat-jenderal-pemasyarakatan-tahun-2022.

Puslitdatin BNN. “Indonesia Drugs Report 2022.” Pusat Penelitian, Data, dan Informasi Badan Narkotika Nasional, 24 November 2022, https://ppid.bnn.go.id/konten/unggahan/2022/08/IDR-2022.pdf.

Usmin. “17 Inmates Charged for Fatal Bengkulu Prison Riot.” Jakarta Globe, 1 Desember 2016, https://jakartaglobe.id/news/17-inmates-charged-fatal-bengkulu-prison-riot.

World Health Organization. "Discussion paper: Principles of drug dependence treatment.” https://www.unodc.org/documents/drug-treatment/UNODC-WHO-Principles-of-Drug-Dependence-Treatment-March08.pdf.