Dry Port Financial Feasibility Analysis Model

Authors

  • Nurlaela Kumala Dewi Faculty of Logistics and Technology, University of Logistics and International Business, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Riza Fathoni Ishak Faculty of Engineering, Pasundan University, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Afferdhy Ariffien Faculty of Logistics and Technology, University of Logistics and International Business, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28932/ice.v5i1.7533

Keywords:

dry port, feasibility analysis, scenario

Abstract

The sea transportation system that is interconnected and provides value for loading and unloading services at the main port of Tanjung Priuk is already over capacity. The establishment of a dry port in Tangerang Regency is expected to facilitate the flow of export and import goods, streamline logistics costs, and solve the dwelling time problem that occurs. The plan to establish the Tangerang Dry Port requires an analysis of the financial feasibility of the investment. The method used to solve this problem is using the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV), and Payback Period. This feasibility analysis calculation was carried out during pre-construction and after construction so that these calculations can be used as reference material in every decision-making, especially those related to the finances of Tangerang Dry Port. The feasibility analysis calculation uses 3 (three) scenarios, namely for optimistic conditions the IRR value is 28.8%, for moderate conditions the IRR value is 13.6%, and for pessimistic conditions the IRR value is 7.2%. For optimistic conditions the NPV value is 1,716.7 billion, for moderate conditions the NPV value is 697 billion, for optimistic conditions the NPV value is 255 billion. For optimistic conditions the payback period is 6.87 years, for moderate conditions the payback period is 9.26 years, and for pessimistic conditions the payback period is 11.2 years. From the results above, optimistic, and moderate conditions are the most feasible scenarios for developing the Tangerang Dry Port.

References

Caroles, L. (2022). Analisis Urgensi Pembangunan Hinterland Dry Port Berdasarkan Proyeksi Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah: Studi Kasus Sulawesi Selatan Analysis On The Urgency Of Hinterland Dry Port Development Based On Regional Economic Growth Projections: South Sulawesi Case St. KRESNA: Jurnal Riset Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.36080/jk.v2i1.26

Daryanto, W. M. (2021). Audit, Accounting, and Finance Training for Management Trainees of PT HSBC Jakarta. Journal of Innovation and Community Engagement, 2(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.28932/jice.v2i2.3584

Fauzi, M., Setijadi, S., Hartati, V., Ariyanti, G. I., & Diwangkoro, G. (2023). Analisis Pemilihan Rute Angkutan Peti Kemas 20ft Dry Port Gedebage Ke Pelabuhan Patimban. Jurnal Teknik Industri: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah Dalam Bidang Teknik Industri, 9(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.24014/jti.v9i1.21466

Febriana, N. F. , & Hartanto, C. F. B. (2021). Optimalisasi Pelayanan Impor Barang Selama Pandemi Covid-19 Di Pt. Biru Pratama Logistindo Line Semarang. National Seminar on Maritime and Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 248–256. http://www.beacukai.go.id

Hasmoro, O. H., Mukti, A. H., & Wibowo, E. W. (2021). Analisis Capital Budgeting Sebagai Pendekatan Pengambilan Keputusan Investasi Pembangunan Integrated Dry Bulk Terminal Pelabuhan Pulai Baai, Bengkulu (Studi Kasus Pt Pelabuhan Indonesia Ii). Jurnal Ilmiah Bisnis, Pasar Modal, Dan UMKM, 4(1), 1–10.

Jourdan, M., & Hakim, I. A. (2018). Jam 16, 4. 30, 553–564. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.04.01

Khaslavskaya, A., & Roso, V. (2019). Outcome-driven supply chain perspective on dry ports. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5), 0–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051492

Nugraha, Y., Mudjiono, M., & Edi, D. W. (2017). Biaya Logistik Dan Kelancaran Pengiriman Barang Pada Gerai Buku. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi Dan Logistik, 3(2), 227. https://doi.org/10.25292/j.mtl.v3i2.103

Nuraeni, Adrianto, L., & Sukardi. (2014). Evaluasi Kualitas Jasa Pelabuhan Daratan ( Dry Port ) Evaluation Service Quality Dry Port (Case Study : Cikarang Dry Port). Warta Penelitian Perhubungan, 26(12), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.25104/warlit.v26i12.954

Puspitasari, R. (2015). Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Cikarang Dry Port Dengan Metode Importance - Performance Analysis Dan Kano Analysis Of Cikarang Dryport Service Quality Using Importance - Reni Puspitasari Puslitbang Perhubungan Darat dan Perkeretaapian Jl . Medan Mereka Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Multimoda, 13(November 2014), 121–134.

Sahara, S., & Silitonga, R. J. (2022). Optimalisasi Kegiatan Trucking di PT. Jasa Prima Logistik Bulog. Logistik, 15(02), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.21009/logistik.v15i02.26382

Samekto, A. A., & Soejanto, S. (2014). Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan Ekspedisi Muatan Kapal Laut Melalui Diversifikasi Usaha. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik (JMTRANSLOG), 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.54324/j.mtl.v1i1.3

Utami, W. S. (2015). Economics Development Analysis Journal Percepatan Dwelling Time : Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja Perdagangan Internasional Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok. Edaj, 4(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v4i1.14807

Yulianti, F., Astuti, M. D., & Oktafiani, A. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Sukses Pemilihan Lokasi Pembangunan Dry Port Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Infomasi Terapan, 6(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.33197/jitter.vol6.iss1.2019.323

Downloads

Published

2024-02-25

How to Cite

Dewi, N. K., Ishak, R. F., & Ariffien, A. (2024). Dry Port Financial Feasibility Analysis Model. Journal of Innovation and Community Engagement, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.28932/ice.v5i1.7533

Issue

Section

Articles