Q4 Syndrome in Public Sector Financial Management: Case and Evidence from a Spending Unit of Indonesia’s Ministry of Transportation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to investigate the manifestation and underlying drivers of Q4 Syndrome, defined as the concentration of government expenditure in the final quarter of the fiscal year, within a working unit of Indonesia’s Ministry of Transportation.
Design/Methodology/Approach – The research employs a quantitative case study approach using descriptive financial analysis. Monthly budget realization data, expenditure composition, and procurement/payment execution timing over a single fiscal year are analyzed to identify spending patterns and execution dynamics.
Results – The findings reveal a significant concentration of budget absorption in the fourth quarter, with a substantial proportion of annual expenditure executed during this period. Capital expenditures and procurement-related payments were heavily clustered in the final months, indicating delayed execution rather than evenly distributed disbursement throughout the fiscal year.
Research limitations/Implications – The study provides case-based empirical evidence of Q4 Syndrome at the operational level. Institutional incentives—such as absorption-based performance evaluation, concerns over future budget reductions, and compliance-oriented controls—contribute to risk-averse spending behavior in earlier quarters. However, the single-unit case design limits generalizability. The findings highlight the need to shift performance measurement from absorption rates toward output-based indicators and to strengthen early-stage budget execution mechanisms.
Keywords: Budget Absorption, Government Budget Execution, Public Sector Financial Management, Q4 Syndrome
Design/Methodology/Approach – The research employs a quantitative case study approach using descriptive financial analysis. Monthly budget realization data, expenditure composition, and procurement/payment execution timing over a single fiscal year are analyzed to identify spending patterns and execution dynamics.
Results – The findings reveal a significant concentration of budget absorption in the fourth quarter, with a substantial proportion of annual expenditure executed during this period. Capital expenditures and procurement-related payments were heavily clustered in the final months, indicating delayed execution rather than evenly distributed disbursement throughout the fiscal year.
Research limitations/Implications – The study provides case-based empirical evidence of Q4 Syndrome at the operational level. Institutional incentives—such as absorption-based performance evaluation, concerns over future budget reductions, and compliance-oriented controls—contribute to risk-averse spending behavior in earlier quarters. However, the single-unit case design limits generalizability. The findings highlight the need to shift performance measurement from absorption rates toward output-based indicators and to strengthen early-stage budget execution mechanisms.
Keywords: Budget Absorption, Government Budget Execution, Public Sector Financial Management, Q4 Syndrome
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Damarjati, E. (2026). Q4 Syndrome in Public Sector Financial Management: Case and Evidence from a Spending Unit of Indonesia’s Ministry of Transportation. Jurnal Akuntansi, 18(1), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v18i1.15073
Section
Articles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.