Performance Evaluation of SRPMM in a 5-Story Steel Building Using Pushover Analysis with Variations in Deformation-Controlled and Force-Controlled Modeling

Authors

  • Andy Prabowo Program Studi Magister Teknik Sipil, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, 11440, Indonesia
  • Rangga Winata Program Studi Sarjana Teknik Sipil, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, 11440, Indonesia
  • Usman Wijaya Program Studi Sarjana Teknik Sipil, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, 11440, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28932/jts.v22i1.11470

Keywords:

Deformation-Controlled, Force-Controlled, Intermediate Moment Resisting Frame System (IMRFS), Performance Evaluation, Pushover Analysis

Abstract

This study utilizes pushover analysis to evaluate the performance of Intermediate Moment Resisting Frame System (IMRFS) used as the lateral force resisting system on the five stories building. Two structural models were analysed with differences on plastic hinge allocations and the controlling behaviour. On Model 1, plastic hinges were assigned to the designated beam and columns with deformation-controlled behaviour, while on Model 2, the plastic hinges on the columns were changed to force-controlled. Building modelling was in 3-dimension using ETABS v.20.0.0. Evaluations of the structural performance used two methods. Based on the structural performance evaluation using the Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM) and the Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM), the performance level of Model 1 is IO–LS in the X direction and > CP in the Y direction. Meanwhile, the performance level achieved by Model 2 is > CP in both the X and Y directions. In addition to the performance level evaluation, verification was also conducted on the values of the response modification factor (R), overstrength factor (Ω₀), and deflection amplification factor (Cd) obtained from the pushover analysis. The R values for both models are approximately 3, which is lower than the R value specified for SRPMM in SNI 1726:2019. The Ω₀ values for Models 1 and Model 2 are approximately 1.5 and 2.4, respectively. The Cd values for Models 1 and Model 2 range from 4.3 to 4.8 and from 5.5 to 5.8, respectively, for both the X and Y directions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amrullah, W., Bagio, T. H., & Tistogondo, J. (2019). Desain perencanaan struktur gedung 38 lantai dengan Sistem Pemikul Rangka Momen Khusus (SRPMK). Jurnal Ilmiah MITSU (Media Informasi Teknik Sipil Universitas Wiraraja), 7(1), 18-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.24929/ft.v7i1.679

Andriyani, Y., Komara, I., Pertiwi, D., Susanti, E., & Propika, J. (2021). Analisa sistem rangka pemikul momen menengah terhadap karakteristik kelas situs batuan keras (SA), batuan (SB) dan batuan lunak (SC) berbasis response spectrum. Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Perencanaan, Perancangan, Lingkungan, dan Infrastruktur, 188-198.

Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2020). Ketentuan seismik untuk bangunan gedung baja struktural (SNI 7860). http://sispk.bsn.go.id/SNI/DaftarList

Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2019). Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung (SNI 1726). http://sispk.bsn.go.id/SNI/DaftarList

FEMA 440, 2005, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Washington, DC.

Christianto, D. & Hendrawan, R. (2022). Faktor Daktilitas Struktur Beton Bertulang Dengan Bresing Baja Eksentris. Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil (JMTS), 5(4), 881-888.

Dewobroto, W. (2005). Evaluasi kinerja struktur baja tahan gempa. Prosiding Civil Engineering National Conference : Sustainability Construction & Structural Engineering Based on Professionalism, Semarang, Indonesia, 17-18 Juni 2025.

Fadillah, T., & Mushthofa, M. (2024). Perbandingan respon seismik sistem rangka pemikul momen biasa dan menengah pada gedung simetris dua arah. Journal of Civil Engineering Building and Transportation, 8(1), 163-175.

Fatkur, R., & Pujo, P. (2021). Analisis kinerja struktur pada konstruksi baja dan konstruksi beton bertulang dengan analisa pushover statik non-linear menggunakan software ETABS (studi kasus : Hotel Santika, Batam). Journal of Civil Engineering and Planning, 1(2), 64-76.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (FEMA P 695), Washington, DC.

Karisoh, P. H., Dapas, S. O., & Pandaleke, R. (2018). Perencanaan struktur gedung beton bertulang dengan sistem rangka pemikul momen khusus. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 6(6), 361-372.

Lee, S. Y., Noh, S. Y., & Lee, D. (2021). Comparison of progressive collapse resistance capacities of steel ordinary and intermediate moment frames considering different connection details. Engineering Structures, 231, 111753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111753

Nugrafindo, Y., Rafki, I., & Zulva, A. (2019). Evaluasi kinerja struktur gedung rumah sakit paru Sumatera Barat dengan pushover analysis. Civil Engineering Collaboration, 4(2), 1-9.

Nuraga, K., Putri, D. A. P. A. G., Antriksa, K., & Ficher, J. (2021). Analisis Daktilitas Struktur Gedung Rangka Beton Bertulang Dengan Metode Analisis Pushover (Studi: Gedung Tugu Reasuransi Indonesia Jakarta). Jurnal Ilmiah Telsinas Elektro, Sipil dan Teknik Informasi, 4(2), 98-105.

Pandaleke, R., Pangouw, J., & Khosama, L. (2013, September). Perencanaan sistem rangka pemikul momen khusus pada komponen balok–kolom dan sambungan struktur baja gedung BPJN XI. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 1(10), 653-663.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Prabowo, A., Winata, R., & Wijaya, U. (2026). Performance Evaluation of SRPMM in a 5-Story Steel Building Using Pushover Analysis with Variations in Deformation-Controlled and Force-Controlled Modeling. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 22(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.28932/jts.v22i1.11470