Curator's Immunity Right Against Civil Claims In The Management Of Bankruptcy Boedel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v17i1.10080Keywords:
Bankruptcy, Curator, Immunity RightAbstract
The uncertainty of legal protection for curators in executing the settlement of bankrupt estates, who often face civil lawsuits. Although curators perform their duties based on court orders, they are not equipped with adequate immunity rights like other legal professions, such as advocates and notaries. The right to immunity is a freedom and or immunity of the curator profession from all lawsuits in carrying out the administration of bankruptcy assets as long as it is carried out in good faith. The lack of immunity for the curator has the effect of disrupting the task of administering the bankruptcy estate. This study aims to analyze the regulations regarding immunity rights for legal professions in Indonesia and the implementation of curatorial immunity in facing civil lawsuits. The research employs a normative juridical method with a legislative and analytical approach. The findings of this research indicate that, despite the crucial role curators play in the bankruptcy process, there is no explicit regulation providing immunity rights against civil lawsuits. There is a need for revisions to the applicable laws so that the immunity rights of curators can be clearly and comprehensively regulated, thereby providing legal certainty, utility, and justice for curators in carrying out the settlement of bankrupt estates. The findings offered are to revise the Bankruptcy Law to add a regulation on Curator immunity, or make a special regulation on the Curator Profession by including the Right to Immunity, or establish a joint ethics board as a performance supervisor by the curator.Downloads
References
Books
Aprita, Serlika. Etika Profesi Kurator. Jember, Pustaka Abadi, 2019.
Efendi, Jonaedi, et al. Kamus Istilah Hukum Populer. Jakarta, Prenada Media Group, 2016.
Fuady, Munir. Filsafat dan Teori Hukum Postmodern. Bandung, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
Fuady, Munir. Hukum Kontrak (Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis). Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.
Hamidi, Jazim, et al. Membedah Teori-Teori Hukum Kontemporer. Malang, UB Press, 2013.
Christiawan, Rio. Hukum Kepailitan & Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020.
Muhamad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti, 2010.
Muchsin. Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum bagi Investor Indonesia. Surakarta, Alumni, 2003.
Raharjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Rizkia, Nanda Dwi. Politik Hukum Kerjasama Penelitian Asing. Bandung, Penerbit P.T. ALUMNI, 2021.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Jakarta, Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 2010.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta, Prenadamedia Group, 2016.
Subhan, M Hadi. Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta, Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2014.
Yahman and Nurtin Tarigan. Peran Advokat Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jakarta, Kencana, 2019.
Interview
Interview with Curator Muhammad Arifuddin, Member of the Indonesian Receivers and Administrators Association (AKPI) Batch 21, March 10, 2024
Journals
Farras, Maulana and Elfrida R. Gultom. “Gugatan lain-lain Oleh Kreditur Kepada Debitor Pasca Berakhirnya Kepailitan.” Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2023, p. 227, https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v6i2.19700.
Hafidzi, Anwar. “Eksistensi Advokat Sebagai Profesi Terhormat (Officium Nobile) Dalam Sistem Negara Hukum Di Indonesia.” Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora, Vol. 12. No. 2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v13i1.517.
Hartini, Rahayu. “Curator’s Legal Efforts in Executing State-Owned Enterprise Assets in Bankruptcy.” AMCA Journal of Community Development, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2021, pp. 27–30, https://doi.org/10.51773/ajcd.v1i2.65.
Kurniawan, Aan Rizalni, et al. “Hak Imunitas Kurator Dalam Eksekusi Harta Debitor Pailit.” Disiplin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 27, No.1, 2021, p.68, https://doi.org/10.46839/disiplin.v27i1.24.
Novi, Fransiska Putri Novi and Suryono. “Implementasi Hak Imunitas Advokat dalam Praktek Peradilan Pidana.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, Vol. 1 No. 3, 2024, p. 5, https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i3.2104.
Pratiwi, Endang, et al. “Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?.” Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 19, No, 2, 2022, p. 275, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1922.
Raissa, Amanda, et al. “Kelemahan Kurator Dalam Pemberesan Harta Pailit.” Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2020, p. 215, http://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v3i2.3442.
Ranovianto, Aditya Rizal and Merline Eva Lyanthi, “Tanggung Jawab Perdata Atas Tindakan Lalai Kurator Dalam Kepengurusan Harta Pailit (Boedel Pailit).” Journal Publicuho, Vol 7. No.3, 2024, pp. 1054–64, https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v7i3.457.
Rokhma, Fadila Ilaina dan Made Warka, “Kewenangan Kurator Dalam Pemberesan Boedel Pailit Debitur Yang Masih Dalam Sengketa.” Bureaucracy Journal, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2023, p. 2788, https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i3.363.
Ruslina, Elli, et al. “General Confiscation Versus Criminal Confiscation in Regard to Curators Authority and Responsibility in Bankruptcy Settlement Process.” Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2020, pp. 112–16, https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.3.2.1803.112-116.
Setiawan., Agus. “Penalaran hukum yang mampu mewujudkan tujuan hukum secara proporsional.” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2017, p. 210, https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v3i2.257.
Silalahi, Rumelda and Onan Purba, “Peran Dan Wewenang Kurator Dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas.” Jurnal Retentum, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v2i2.710.
Singal, Nicky Yehezkiel. “Kajian Hukum Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Pasca Putusan Pengadilan Niaga.” Lex Privatum, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2022, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/38087.
Sugiyatmo, Agus and Elfrida Ratnawati. “Perlindungan Hukum dan Batasan Hak Imunitas Advokat dan Kurator.” Ensiklopedia of Journal, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2024, p. 317, https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v6i4.2458.
Sukardi, Didi. “The Legal Responsibility Of Debtor To Payment Curators In Bankruptcy Situation.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2021, p. 142, http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v8i2.15905.
Sukma, Cantika Ayuri, et al. “Kedudukan Kurator Dalam Pemberesan Harta Pailit Sesuai Undang-Undang No.37 Tahun 2004.” Judakum: Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2023, p. 220, http://103.241.192.17/~jurnalunidha/index.php/JDH/issue/view/53.
Thabrani, Machsun. “Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Yang Dinyatakan Pailit.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Qula Iustum, Vol. 9, No. 19, 2002, pp. 20–28, https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss19.art2.
Yalid. “Persyaratan dan Prospek Serta Gagasan Imunitas Terhadap Kurator yang Beritikad Baik.” Jurnal Hukum Respublika, Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 51, https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v16i1.1425.
Thesis or Dissertation
Pratama, Aditya and Parulian Paidi Aritonang, Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Independensi Kurator Terkait Ancaman Pidana Memasukan Keterangan Palsu Dalam Pemberesan Harta Pailit (Studi Kasus PT. Kymco Lippo Motor Indonesia), Skripsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014, p. 13, https://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20387620.
Saputra, Irfan Eka, Perspektif Hak Imunitas Kurator Saat Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, Thesis UPNVJ, Jakarta, 2017, pp. 7-8, http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/4652.
Law and Regulations
Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright
Online Resources
Oktavira, Bernadetha Aurelia. “Tugas Kurator dan Hakim Pengawas dalam Kepailitan.” Hukum Online, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/tugas-kurator-dan-hakim-pengawas-dalam-kepailitan-cl738/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dedi Irwansyah, Joni Emirzon, Putu Samawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.