PENGATURAN/FORMULASI PIDANA MATI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI CHINA, VIETNAM, DAN THAILAND

Irvino Rangkuti

doi:10.28932/di.v14i2.5961

Authors

Irvino Rangkuti Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v14i2.5961

Keywords:

Corruption, Death Penalty, Extraordinary Crimes

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to clarify the application of the death penalty against corruptors in other countries and to assess existing laws in Indonesia whether the death penalty is used against corruptors and causes conflict. The death penalty is classified as an extraordinary crime. This study uses research that uses prescriptive legal methods. This research is descriptive in nature. The analysis technique used is descriptive technique and the collection of legal material used is literature search. This study uses a statutory approach to evaluate existing regulations. The production of this journal is based on a comparative approach. This approach is carried out as a comparison of existing regulations in Indonesia with regulations in other countries. The conclusion from writing this diary is that there are differences in the rules for applying the death penalty for corruptors in Vietnam and in Thailand, where there is a degree of corruption that makes the death penalty a threat. On the other hand, in Indonesia, corrupt people can be executed because there is no fixed level of income from corruption. Another thing that affects the application of the death penalty in Indonesia is that Indonesia has regulations that conflict with the death penalty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Irvino Rangkuti, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Irvino Rangkuti, was born at November 29th, 1984, Hold a Master's of Law from the Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan. Now, as a student in the Doctoral Program at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan. Worked as a West Java High Prosecutor"s Functional Attorney .

References

Books

Atmasasmita, Romli. Teori Hukum Integratif. Yogyakarta, Genta Publishing, 2012.

Hood, Roger. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective, 3rd Ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 2002.

Jaya, Nyoman Sarekat Putra. Beberapa Pemikiran Ke Arah Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta, Citra Aditya Bakti, 2008.

Kasyanto, H. Agus. Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Pada Proses Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa. Jakarta, Prenada Media, 2018.

Rahim, Abdur, et al. Hukuman Mati Problem Legalitas & Kemanusiaaan. Malang, Intrans Institute, 2015.

Widodo, Eddyono Supriadi. Politik Kebijakan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Dari Masa ke Masa. Jakarta, Tim Institute Criminal Justice Reform, 2017.

Journals

Andalas, Eggy Fajar, et al. “Memori terorisme: Memori traumatis dan strategi mengatasi trauma korban Bom Bali I dalam teks sastra Indonesia.” Satwika, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2022, pp. 167-179, https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v6i1.20347.

Anjari, Warih. “Penerapan Pidana Mati Terhadap Terpidana Kasus Korupsi.” Masalah- Masalah Hukum, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2020, pp. 432-442, https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.4.2020.432-442.

Awaliyah, Rizqi Nurul. “Perbandingan Pengaturan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia dan China.” Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2015, pp. 73-84, https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v4i1.40551.

Dewi, Ni Komang Ratih Kumala. “Keberadaan Pidana Mati Dalam Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2020, pp. 104-114, https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23444.

Fagan, Jeffrey. “Death and Deterrence Redux: Science, Law and Causal Reasoning on Capital Punishment”, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 255-320, https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1427?utm_source=scholarship.law.columbia.edu%2Ffaculty_scholarship%2F1427&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.

Hamenda, Veive Large. “Tinjauan Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Penerapan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia.” Lex Crimen, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2013, pp. 113-119, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/1003/816.

Irdini, Kesuma. “Legal Comparison against the Death Penalty Sanctions regulated in the Positive Laws of Indonesia and China.” Corruptio, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2021, pp. 113-126, https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v2i2.2387.

Julyano, Mario and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” Jurnal Crepido, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2019, pp. 13-22, https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22.

Krisnawati, N. dan Suatra Putrawan. “Penerapan Hukuman Mati Secara Massal di Mesir Ditinjau Dari Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional”. Jurnal Kertha Negara, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 1-5, https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Kerthanegara/article/view/15201/10062.

Mahgfiroh, Afriza Fitri, et al. “Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional Terhadap Kejahatan Kemanusiaan Dalam Perang Bosnia.” Lontar Merah, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2022, pp. 452-460, https://jom.untidar.ac.id/index.php/lontarmerah/article/view/2635/0.

Marbun, Roy Ganda, dkk. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Extra Ordinary Crime.” Jurnal Ilmiah Simantek, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2020, pp. 234-243, https://simantek.sciencemakarioz.org/index.php/JIK/article/vi ew/184/161.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. “Kajian Filosofis tentang Konsep Keadilan dari Pemikiran Klasik sampai Pemikiran Modern.” Yustitia, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2014, pp. 118-130, https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11106.

Pratama, Widhy Andrian. “Penegakan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2019, pp. 29-41, https://doi.org/10.3 7276/sjh.v1i1.34.

Purba, Elizabeth. “Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Krupsi di Berbagai Negara yang Menerapkan Hukuman Mati (Indonesia, China, dan Thailand).” Jurnal Mahupiki, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2018, pp. 1-28, https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/doc uments/detail/1433357.

Soge, Paulinus. “Tinjauan Yuridis Eksekusi Pidana Mati di Indonesia.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2012, pp. 94-104, https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v1i3.10092.

Wardani, Koko Arianto dan Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. “Kebijakan Formulasi Hukuman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2017, pp. 951-958, http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jhku/article/view/2571/1928.

Wicaksono, Setiawan. “Hambatan Dalam Menerapkan Pasal 6 Konvenan Internasional Tentang Hak-Hak Sipil Dan Politik Sebagai Dasar Penghapusan Pidana Mati di Indonesia.” Pandecta Research Law Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2016, pp. 65-79, https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pandecta/article/view/6682/4992.

Yanto, Oksidelfa. “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Keadaan Tertentu (Death Penalty to Corruptors in a Certain Condition).” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2017, pp. 49-56, http://eprints.unpam.ac.id/id/e print/6099.

Law and Regulations

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

The Criminal Code (KUHP).

Law No. 31 of 1999 on Eradication of Criminal Act of Corruption.

Law No 39 of 1999 on Human Rights.

Criminal Procedure Code of Thailand (No.29), BE 2551 (2008) International Convenant on Civil and Political Right 1966.

Online Resources

Al-Faruqi, Jabir. “Sempurnalah Korupsi di Indonesia”, Antikorupsi.org, 10 Maret 2010, http://antikorupsi.org/indo/content/view/16577/7/.

Anshoriy, H.M. Nasruddin. “Jihad Melawan Korupsi.” Ombudsman-asahan.org, 2008, https://www.ombudsman-asahan.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=399&Itemid=74.

Balipost. “Korupsi: Kejahatan Moral dan Kemanusiaan.” Balipost.com, https://www.balipost.com/BaliPostcetak/2008/1/29/o2.html