Implementation of the Principle of Justice in the Formation and Substance of Government Regulation

Authors

  • Demson Tiopan Universitas Kristen Maranatha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v15i1.7449

Keywords:

Justice, Responsive, Conservative, Perppu Cipta Kerja

Abstract

Prosperity can be achieved through the realization of order and organization within society. The principle of justice serves as one of the indicators that determine the attainment of the desired order and organization. In the concrete legal context, the process of forming legislation is required to reflect the presence of the justice principle inherent within it. A legal product is considered to fulfill the justice principle if it falls under the category of responsive law. Responsive law takes into account both functional and procedural aspects of its formation. This research uses a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach. The statutory approach is an approach used by basing it on the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations. This research aims to examine the implementation of the principle of justice in the substance and formation Government Regulation in Lieu of Law on Job Creation (Perppu Cipta Kerja). Perppu Cipta Kerja is perceived to not reflect the justice principle as it lacks the elements characteristic of responsive law. Consequently, the Perppu Cipta Kerja is categorized as a legal product that does not embody the value of justice, falling into the classification of conservative legal products. Therefore, it is imperative for the government to conduct a reevaluation of the formation process and functional aspects, particularly regarding the substantive content, to ensure it aligns with the justice principles mandated by the law. This alignment would facilitate the realization of order and organization within society, ultimately contributing to the welfare of the populace.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Asshidqie, Jimly. Perihal Undang-Undang di Indonesia. Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2006.

Ibrahim, Johannes. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang, Bayumedia Publishing, 2007.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.

MD, Mahfud. Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta, Rajawali Press, 2012.

Sametko, FX. Adji. Justice Not for All. Yogyakarta, Genta Press, 2008.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta, Universitas Indonesia, 1986.

_______________. Sosiologi: Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2009.

Journals

Alhakim, Abdurrakhman and Ega Ginting. “Analisis Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Pada Tahapan Perencanaan dan Penyusunan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal UIB, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2021, pp. 284-296.

Aprita, Serlika and Rio Adhitya. “Penerapan Asas Keadilan dalam Hukum Kepailitan Sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitor.” Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019, pp. 46-56, https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.31.

Arifin, Wandi. “Asas Keadilan Upah Guru Honorer dalam Perspektif Hukum.” Riau Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019, pp. 85-104, http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v3i1.6956.

Atmadja, Dewa Gede. “Asas-Asas Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum.” Kertha Wicaksana, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2018, pp. 145-155, https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.12.2.2018.145-155.

Cakra, I Putu Eka. “Kompatibilitas Penerapan Konsep Omnibus Law Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Crepido, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2020, pp. 59-69, https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.2.2.59-69.

Fadil, Muhammad. “Pembentukan Undang-Undang yang Mengikuti Perkembangan Masyarakat.” Jurnal Legislasi, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2018, pp. 51-61, https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v15i1.12.

Keladu, Yosef. “Kesamaan Proporsional dan Ketidaksamaan Perlakuan dalam Teori Keadilan Aristoteles.” DISKURSUS, Vol. 1 No. 19, 2023, pp. 54-78, https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v19i1.347.

Laia, Aturkian. “Hukum Sebagai Panglima dalam Dunia Mitos dan Politik Sebagai Raja Pada Realitasnya.” Civic Society Research and Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2022, pp. 1-12.

Marzuki, Munawar and Ibnu Affan. “Analisis dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2021, pp. 452-468, http://doi.org/10.47652/metadata/v312.

Muslih, M. “Negara Hukum Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch.” Legalitas, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2013, pp. 130-152, http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v4i1.117.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. “Kajian Filosofis tentang Konsep Keadilan dari Pemikiran Klasik sampai Pemikiran Modern.” Yustisia, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2014, pp. 118-130, https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11106.

Partiah, Siti and Anis Farida. “Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusi Non-Self Executing.” Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2021, pp. 49-70.

Putra, Antoni. “Implikasi Putusan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2023, pp. 58-77, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2014.

Rahayu, Sri. “Implikasi Asas Legalitas Terhadap Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan.” Jurnal Inovatif, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2014, pp. 1-12.

Sembiring, Riki. “Keadilan Pancasila dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan Aristoteles.” Aktual Jusctice, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2018, pp. 139-155, https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.539.

Sihombing, Deus Levolt, et al. “Peran Naskah Akademik dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan”. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2022, pp. 230-239.

Suheri, Ana. “Wujud Keadilan dalam Masyarakat Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Morality, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2018, pp. 60-68.

Supriyadi and Andi Intan Purnamasari. “Gagasan Penggunaan Metode Omnibus Law dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2021, pp. 257-270, http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.257-270.

Law and Regulations

Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Employment.

Law Number 17 of 2012 concerning Food.

Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Amendments to Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining.

Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation.

Online Resources

FORMAH PK. “Perppu Ciptaker; Kegentingan atau Kelicikan?” Forum Mahasiswa Mahasiswa Hukum Peduli Lingkungan.ub.ac.id, 16 February 2023, http://formahpk.hukum.ub.ac.id/perppu-ciptaker-kegentingan-atau-kelicikan/.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Tiopan, D. (2023). Implementation of the Principle of Justice in the Formation and Substance of Government Regulation. Dialogia Iuridica, 15(1), 076–093. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v15i1.7449