Prosecutor's Intelligence Functions in Preventing Corruption: Strategic Development Security Technical Guideline Perspective

Andri Dharma; Madiasa Ablisar; Mahmud Mulyadi; Mirza Nasution

doi:10.28932/di.v14i2.5557

Penulis

Andri Dharma Kejaksaan Negeri Pematang Siantar
Madiasa Ablisar Universitas Sumatera Utara
Mahmud Mulyadi Universitas Sumatera Utara
Mirza Nasution Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v14i2.5557

Kata Kunci:

Attorney;, Intellegence Function;, Strategic Development Security

Abstrak

Corruption crimes are cracked down not only by repressive efforts but also by preventive efforts. The Indonesian Public Prosecutor's Office has several stages of preventive efforts to carry out its intelligence functions. Indonesia's Attorney General's Office has introduced a new program called Security for Strategic Development - Regional Investment in implementing intelligence functions. The issue is what the legal status of the Technical Guidelines on Security for Strategic Development and Regional Investments of the Indonesian Public Prosecutor's Office in Anti-Corruption will be in terms of legal certainty. This study is a prescriptive legal study, descriptive analysis. A legal approach is used as the data is subject to various laws and regulations. Data collection through library and field research surveys accompanied by documentary study and interviews. Based on the qualitative analysis, the results show that the Strategic Development of the Indonesian Public Prosecutor's Office for Prevention of Corruption Crimes and Technical Guidelines for Security of Local Investments regulation was made by Law No.16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, Law No.17 of 2011 concerning State Intelligence, as well as the Regulation of the Attorney General No.PER-006/A/JA/07/2017 concerning the Organization and Work Procedure of the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office does not include the authority to prevent corruption based on the 2004 Attorney General's Law. B-484/D/Dpp/03/2020, dated March 12, 2020, by adapting it to Law No.11 of 2021 concerning the Indonesian Attorney General's Office, to provide legal certainty to prevent corruption.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Books

Ali, Achmad. Menguak Tabir Hukum. Bogor, Ghalia Indonesia, 2008.

Hartanti, Evi. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2007.

Hatta, Muhammad. Kejahatan Luar Biasa (Extra Ordinary Crime). Cet. ke-1. Lhokseumawe, Unimal Press, 2019.

Hijbers, Theo. Filsafat Hukum. Yogyakarta, Kanisius, 1995.

Rama, Tri. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Surabaya, Karya Agung, 2008.

Wahyuni, Fitri. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Tangerang Selatan, Nusantara Persada Utama, 2017.

Yusni, Muhammad. Keadilan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Perspektif Kejaksaan. Surabaya, Airlangga University Press, 2019.

Journals

Aritonang, Yohana EA, et al. “Peranan Kejaksaan dan Upaya Melakukan Pengelolaan Hasil Eksekusi Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Binjai).” Nommensen Law Review, Vol. 1, No.1, 2022, 2022, pp. 14-27, https://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/law_review/article/view/593.

Barhamudin dan Abuyazid Bustomi. “Jaksa Penyidik dan Penuntut Umum Dalam Pidana Korupsi Menurut Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.” Solusi, Vol. 21, No.1, 2023, pp. 68-81, https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v21i1.808.

Dananjaya, I Made Dwi Narendra, et al. “Peranan Intelijen Kejaksaan Dalam Pengungkapan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Kejaksaan Negeri Buleleng).” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, Vol. 3, No.1, 2022, pp. 12-16, https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.3.1.4593.12-16.

Drani, Fuzi Narin. “Penyelesaian Korupsi dengan Menggunakan Restoratif Justice.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol. 20, No.4, 2020, pp. 605-617, http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.605-617.

Harahap, M. Dedy Iskandar, et al. “Peran Intelijen Kejaksaan Dalam Mengungkap Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata, Vol. 3, No.3, 2021, pp. 1122-1146, https://doi.org/10.10101/metadata.v3i3.

Hutahaeian, Armunanto dan Erlyn Indarti. “Lembaga Penyidik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu di Indonesia.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 16, No.1, 2019, pp. 27-41, https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v16i1.453

Imron, Ali. “Peran dan Kedudukan Empat Pilar Dalam Penegakan Hukum Hakim Jaksa Polisi Serta Advocat Dihubungkan Dengan Penegakan Hukum Pada Kasus Korupsi.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 6, No.1, 2016, pp. 83-107, http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v6i1.340.

Intaran, Putu Deneil Pradipta, et al. “Pelaksanaan Tugas Dan Fungsi Kejaksaan Sebagai Tim Pengawal Dan Pengaman Pemerintahan Dan Pembangunan Daerah Dalam Pencegahan Korupsi Di Kejaksaan Negeri Denpasar.” Kertha Wicara, Vol. 7, No.4, 2018, pp. 1-17, https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/41813.

Iswara, I Made Agus Mahendra dan Ketut Adi Wirawan. “Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Desa di Indonesia.” Kertha Wicaksana, Vol. 14, No.1, 2020, pp. 190-199, https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.14.1.2020.69-76.

Jacob, Jacklin M. “Peran dan Fungsi Kejaksaan Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia.” Lex Et Societatis, Vol. 7, No.2, 2019, pp. 189-196, https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v7i2.24670.

Julyano, Mario dan Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” Jurnal Crepido, Vol. 1, No.1, 2019, hlm. 13-22, https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22.

Ningrum, Putu Ary Prastya. “Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Pariksa: Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu, Vol. 2, No.2, 2018, pp. 1-7, https://doi.org/10.55115/pariksa.v2i2.698.

Santosa, Sigit Budi. “Kewenangan Kejaksaan Sebagai Penyidik Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Maksimagama Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 18, No.1, 2015, pp. 77-90, https://doi.org/10.37303/.v9i1.6.

Saragih, Yasmirah Mandasari. “Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Al’Adl, Vol. 9, No.1, 2017, pp. 49-66, http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v9i1.802

Sari, Novi Mardihana dan I Nyoman Budiana. “Limitatif Kewenangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Vol. 8, No.9, 2020, pp. 1324-1331, https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2020.v08.i09.p03 .

Saripi, Mohammad Ridwan. “Jaksa Selaku Penyidik Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, Vol. 22, No.7, 2016, pp. 20-32, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jurnalhukumunsrat/article/view/13195.

Satria, Hariman. “Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol. 25, No.1, 2018, pp. 111-123, https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0107.111-123.

Sosiawan, Ulang Mangun. “Peran Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol. 19, No.4, 2019, pp. 517-538, http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.517-538.

Sutadi, Lina. “Pencegahan dan Penangkalan (Cekal) Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.” Law Faculty of MPU Tantular University Yure Humano, Vol. 2, No.1, 2018, pp. 1-18, https://mputantular.ac.id/ojshukum/index.php/yurehumano/article/view/55.

Yuliani, Andi. “Daya Ikat Pengundangan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 14, No.4, 2017, pp. 429-438, https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v14i4.121.

Yusuf, Muhammad, et al. “Kedudukan Jaksa Sebagai Pengacara Negara Dalam Lingkup Perdata dan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Yustika, Vol. 21, No.2, 2018, pp. 12-28, https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v21i02.1500.

Law and Regulations

Law No.18 of 1981 on Principles of Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP).

Law No.16 of 2004 on Public Prosecution Service of the Republic of Indonesia.

Law No.11 of 2021 on the Amendment of Law No.16 of 2004 on Public Prosecution.

Presidential Regulation No.54 of 2018 on the National Strategy of Corruption Eradication.

Technical Guideline No.B-484/D/Dpp/03/2020 regarding the Strategic Development Security.

MoU No.KEP-049/A/J.A/03/2012, No.B/23/III/2012, and No.SP3-39/01/03/2012 on Optimizing Eradication of Criminal Act of Corruption.

Online Resources

Anonim. “2 Tersangka Korupsi Rp. 109 M PT. Perkebunan Ditahan.” CNN Indonesia, 5 November 2021, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20211105093707-12-716956/2-tersangka-korupsi-rp109-m-pt-perkebunan-sumut-ditahan.

Kejaksaan Agung RI. “Tentang Kejaksaan.” https://www.kejaksaan.go.id/profil_kejaksaan.php?id=1, Kejaksaan Agung RI.

Nasution, Anugerah. “Para Pejabat Siantar Dalam Pusaran Kasus Korupsi.” Tagar.id, 23 Juli 2020, https://www.tagar.id/para-pejabat-siantar-dalam-pusaran-kasus-korupsi.

Pekuwali, Daniel. “Gubernur Edy Malu, Sumut Peringkat 2 Provinsi Terkorup di Indonesia.” Kompas.com, 10 Juni 2021, https://regional.kompas.com/read/2021/06/10/140212478/gubernur-edy-malu-sumut-peringkat-2-provinsi-terkorup-di-indonesia?page=all.

Pribadi, Teguh. “Korupsi Pengadaan Internet, Kadis Kominfo Pematangsiantar dan Sekretarisnya Ditahan.” Kompas.com, 22 Juli 2020, https://regional.kompas.com/read/2020/07/22/22083181/korupsi-pengadaan-internet-kadis-kominfo-pematangsiantar-dan-sekretarisnya?page=all.

Rifzaldi, Riffi. “TP4D Bukan Pengaman Proyek, Asintel Kejati Sumut: Laporkan Jaksa Nakal.” Tagar.id, 22 Juni 2018, https://www.tagar.id/tp4d-bukan-pengaman-proyek-asintel-kejati-sumut-laporkan-jaksa-nakal.

Rri.co.id. “Lewat PPS, Kejaksaan Amankan Kegiatan Proyek Rp. 252 Triliun.” rri.co.id, Mei 2022, https://rri.co.id/semarang/ruang-publik/press-release/1434535/lewat-pps-kejaksaan-amankan-kegiatan-proyek-rp-252-triliun.

Sanusi, Didi G. “TP4D Dibubarkan Diganti Unit Kerja Baru Bernama PPS.” Jejakrekam.com, 13 Desember 2019, https://jejakrekam.com/2019/12/13/tp4d-dibubarkan-diganti-unit-kerja-baru-bernama-pps/.

Wismabrata, Michael Hangga. “9 Kepala Daerah di Sumatera Utara Yang Terjerat Korupsi.” Kompas.com, 19 Juli 2018, https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/07/19/08421331/9-kepala-daerah-di-sumatera-utara-yang-terjerat-korupsi?page=all.

Speech

Prasetyo, H.M. “Inovasi Penegakan Hukum Berbasis Paradigma Restoratif, Korektif dan Rehabilitatif Untuk Percepatan Pembangunan Nasional.” The awarding ceremony of Doctorate Honoris Causa in Law, 22 Februari 2018, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Scientific Speech.