Analisis Tantangan Penerapan Construction Hazard Prevention through Design di Indonesia

Hanna Qurratu A Yunin; Anton  Soekiman

doi:10.28932/jts.v22i2.12924

Penulis

Hanna Qurratu A Yunin Program Sarjana Teknik Sipil, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung, 40141, Indonesia
Anton Soekiman Program Sarjana Teknik Sipil, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung, 40141, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28932/jts.v22i2.12924

Kata Kunci:

AHP, Konstruksi, Konsultan Perencanaan, Pencegahan Kecelakaan

Abstrak

Pencegahan kecelakaan kerja konstruksi dapat dimulai sejak tahap perencanaan. Di Indonesia, pencegahan kecelakaan kerja telah dilakukan saat tahap pelaksanaan melalui program Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3), namun dengan tingkat kepatuhan rendah. Berdasarkan kondisi tersebut, dilakukan penelitian mengenai construction hazard prevention through design yang dilakukan sejak tahapan perencanaan, sehingga dapat meningkatkan keselamatan kerja konstruksi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tantangan penerapan construction hazard prevention through design di negara lain. Penelitian menggunakan data primer dari 37 responden konsultan perencanaan di Kota Bandung dengan jabatan project manager, dan direksi. Setelah dilakukan analisis menggunakan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) didapatkan lima tantangan utama. Lima tantangan construction hazard prevention through design: durasi desain dan pendanaan yang memadai, durasi revisi yang cukup, belum adanya regulasi yang mengatur hubungan dan batasan konsultan perencanaan dengan pihak lainnya, kriteria khusus sebagai konsultan perencana, apabila terjadi tuntutan maupun klaim yang dapat mengancam organisasi perusahaan.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Alvin, V., Nugroho, S., & Alifen, R. S. (2019). Implementasi dan Faktor Hambatan Design for Construction Safety (DfCS).

https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/teknik-sipil/article/view/9634

Behm, M. (2005). Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept. Safety Science, 43(8), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.04.002

Behm, M., Culvenor, J., & Dixon, G. (2014). Development of safe design thinking among engineering students. Safety Science, 63, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.018

Che Ibrahim, C. K. I., Manu, P., Belayutham, S., Mahamadu, A. M., & Antwi-Afari, M. F. (2022). Design for safety (DfS) practice in construction engineering and management research: A review of current trends and future directions. In Journal of Building Engineering (Vol. 52). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104352

Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2007). Safety culture: Analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. Journal of Safety Research, 38(6), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2007.09.001

Fonseca, E. D., Lima, F. P. A., & Duarte, F. (2014). From construction site to design: The different accident prevention levels in the building industry. Safety Science, 70, 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.07.006

Gambatese, J. A. (1998). Liability in Designing for Construction Worker Safety. https://doi.org/doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(1998)4:3(107)

Gambatese, J. A., Asce, M., Behm, Michael, & Hinze, J. W. (2005). Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(9), 1029–1036.

https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE0733-93642005131:91029

Gambatese, J. A., Behm, M., & Rajendran, S. (2008). Design’s role in construction accident causality and prevention: Perspectives from an expert panel. Safety Science, 46(4), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.010

Goh, Y. M., & Chua, S. (2016). Knowledge, attitude and practices for design for safety: A study on civil & structural engineers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 93, 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.023

Haslam, R. A., Hide, S. A., Gibb, A. G. F., Gyi, D. E., Pavitt, T., Atkinson, S., & Duff, A. R. (2005). Contributing factors in construction accidents. Applied Ergonomics, 36(4 SPEC. ISS.), 401–415.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.12.002

Herman, M. W., & Koczkodaj, W. W. (1996). A Monte Carlo study of pairwise comparison. In Information Processing Letters (Vol. 57).

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1505.01888

Jin, Z., Gambatese, J., Karakhan, A., & Nnaji, C. (2023). Analysis of prevention through design studies in construction: A subject review. Journal of Safety Research, 84, 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.015

Khairil, C., Ibrahim, I. C., Belayutham, S., Mohammad, M. Z., & Ismail, S. (2023). Capturing Prevention through Design Practices through the Lens of Industry Practitioners’ Experiences in Occupational Safety and Health in Construction Industry Management Projects. In Journal of Occupational Safety and Health (Vol. 20, Number 1). http://www.niosh.com.my/images/Journal/20231/3.pdf

Larsen, G. D., & Whyte, J. (2013). Safe construction through design: perspectives from the site team. Construction Management and Economics, 31(6), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.798424

López-Arquillos, A., Rubio-Romero, J. C., & Martinez-Aires, M. D. (2015). Prevention through Design (PtD). The importance of the concept in Engineering and Architecture university courses. Safety Science, 73, 8–14.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.006

Machfudiyanto, R. A., Kim, S., Latief, Y., Rachmawati, T. S. N., & Laksono, N. B. (2023). Analysis of design-for-safety implementation factors in the Indonesian construction industry: A two-staged SEM-artificial neural network approach. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21273

Manu, P., Poghosyan, A., Mahamadu, A. M., Mahdjoubi, L., Gibb, A., Behm, M., & Akinade, O. O. (2019). Design for occupational safety and health: key attributes for organisational capability. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(11), 2614–2636. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2018-0389

Rusli, N., Abas, H., & Rahmat, H. (2021). Analysis of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Multiple Designers Towards Prevention-through-Design (PtD) Implementation to Malaysia’s Construction Industry. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering and Built Environment, 2(1), 68–79.

https://doi.org/10.30880/rtcebe

Toh, Y. Z., Goh, Y. M., & Guo, B. H. W. (2017). Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Design for Safety: Multiple Stakeholders in the Singapore Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(5).

https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001279

Toole, T. M. (2018). Motivation for Prevention through Design: Experiential Perspectives and Practice, Special Collection on Construction Safety. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 23(3).

https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000372

Toole, T. M., & Gambatese, J. (2008). The Trajectories of Prevention through Design in Construction. Journal of Safety Research, 39(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2008.02.026

Zhong, Y., Yean Yng Ling, F., & Wu, P. (2016). Using Multiple Attribute Value Technique for the Selection of Structural Frame Material to Achieve Sustainability and Constructability. American Society of Civil Engineers, 143(2).

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862