One Number One Citizen in Indonesia: Solution for Problematic in Court Execution Issues

Hassanain Haykal; Theo  Negoro

doi:10.28932/di.v14i1.5462

Penulis

Hassanain Haykal Faculty of Law, Universitas Kristen Maranatha
Theo Negoro Faculty of Law, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v14i1.5462

Kata Kunci:

The State of Law, One Number One Citizen, Confiscation Execution.

Abstrak

Implementation of executions in civil cases in the Indonesian still leaves legal problems, one of which is in the event that the Execution Applicant that is not aware of the assets that are used as collateral upon the execution request on the condition that the Execution Respondent does not implement the court judgment that has permanent legal force (inkcracht van gewisjde). Despite the importance of the fulfilment of the right of the Execution Applicant as well as an inseparable part of the implementation of the State of Law. The study aims to examine the new concept of One Number One Citizen as an instrument to fulfil the rights. The study wields a normative juridical method with a conceptual approach. The result obtained that the One Number One Citizen concept was inspired by the Social Security Number policy of the United States, where every citizen has an integrated Population Identification Number managed by the Ministry of General Affairs that includes, among others: Personal Data, Transactions, Assets, Insurance, Police Records, whole community activities, varying from identification number, activities such as: tax, banking transaction, motorized vehicles, property registration, and so on, that could be implemented through the Execution Respondent for the execution confiscation could be carried out. The recommendations that could be given are Reform of the Civil Procedure Code and the establishment of a recent situation specifically under the government of the Ministry of General Affairs that is associated with the Supreme Court upon the arrangement of the One Number One Citizen.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Books

Azhari. Negara Hukum Indonesia, Analisis Yuridis Normatif tentang Unsur-Unsur. Jakarta, UI-Press, 1995.

Black, Henry Campbell. Black’s Law Dictionary: Definition of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern. Minnesota, West Publisher, 1968.

Dicey, Albert Venn. Introduction to the Study of Law of the Constitution. London, Macmillan Press, 1979.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta, Gajah Mada University Press, 2005.

_______________. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat. Jakarta, Bina Ilmu, 1987.

Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Hasibuan, Sayuti. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Pendekatan Non Sekuler. Surakarta, Muhammadiya University Press, 2000.

Hidayat, Maskur. Strategi & Taktik Mediasi: Berdasarkan Perma No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Jakarta, Kencana, 2016.

Kansil, CST. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta, Balai Pustaka, 1989.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta, Liberty, 2005.

Nonet, Phillippe & Phillip Selznick. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. London, Harper and Row Publisher, 1978.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Rivai, Veithzal. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.

Sayles, G.O. The Medieval Foundation of England. London, Methuen, 1966.

Subekti. Aneka Perjanjian. Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999.

Wright, Robert E. Fubarnomics: A Lighthearted, Serious Look at America’s Economic Ills. New York, Prometheus, 2010.

Journals

Ardiansyah, Mohammad Kamil. “Pembaruan hukum Oleh Mahkamah Agung dalam Mengisi Kekosongan Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2020, pp. 361-384, http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.V14.361-384.

Arianto, Henr. “Hukum Responsif dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia.” Lez Jurnalica, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2010, pp. 115-123.

Bingham, Lord. “The Rule of Law.” Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2007, pp. 67-85, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197307000037.

Blanco, Dennis. “Of Economic Bubbles and Economic Miracles: Notes and Reflekction from a Non-Expert.” Asia-Pasific Social Science Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2014, pp. 143-161.

Fatah. Abdul. “Gugatan Warga Negara Sebagai Mekanisme Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara.” Yuridika, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2013, pp. 293-303, https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i3.347.

Harahap, M. Syahnan. “Perbedaan Konsepsi Rechstaat dan Rule of Law Serta Perkembangan dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Hukum Administrasi Negara.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2014, pp. 57-63, https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v5i1.102.

Hartono, Bambang. “Hacker Dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2014, pp. 23-30, https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.43.1.2014.23-30.

Kieve, Ronald A. “From Necessary Illusion to Rational Choice?: A Critique of Neo-Marxist Rational-Choice Theory.” Theory and Society, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1986, pp. 557-582.

Koji, Teraya. “Emerging Hierarchy in International Human Rights and Beyonds: From the Perspective of Non-Derogable Rights.” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2001, pp. 917-941, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/12.5.917.

Mazor, Lester. “The Crisis of Liberal Legalism.” The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 81, No. 5, 1972, pp. 1032-1053, https://doi.org/10.2307/795159.

Mitendra, Hario Mahar. “Fenomena Dalam Kekosongan Hukum.” RechtsVinding, Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2018, pp. 1-7.

Nasir, Gamal Abdul. “Kekosongan Hukum & Percepatan Perkembangan Masyarakat.” Jurnal Hukum Replik, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2017, pp. 172-183, http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v5i2.925.

Nugrohandhini, Dwi & Etty Mulyati. “Akibat Hukum Gugatan dan Perlawanan Terhadap Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019, pp. 35-51.

Politon, Reinhard. “Pemenuhan Hak dan Kewajiban Sesuai Kesepakatan Para Pihak Dalam Kontrak Ditinjau Dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.” Lex Crimen, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2017, pp. 136-143.

Ramli, et al. “Studi Kritis Terhadap Ragam Konsep Negara Hukum.” Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2019, pp. 132-147, https://doi.org/10.31764/jmk.v10i2.1969.

Satory, Agus & Hotma Pardomuan Sibuea. “Problematika Kedudukan dan Pengujian Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Secara Materiil Sebagai Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Pakuan Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1-27, https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v6i1.1831.

Online Resources

Collins Dictionary. “Legal protection definition and meaning: Collins English Dictionary.” Collins Dictionary, https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/legal-protection#:~:text=Protections%20are%20laws%20and%20other,protect%20people's%20rights%20and%20freedoms.

Garamone, Jim. “United States Army, Dod to Drop Social Security Numbers from Id Cards.” www.army.mil, https://www.army.mil/article/54310/dod_to_drop_social_security_numbers_from_id_cards.

History.com editors. “Great Depression History.” History.com, Oktober 2009, https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/great-depression-history.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary. “Protection Definition & Meaning.” Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/protection.

Riyanto, Galuh Putri. “8 Kasus Peretasan yang Terjadi di Indonesia Sepanjang 2021.” Kompas.com, Desember 2021, https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2021/12/21/06540017/8-kasus-peretasan-yang-terjadi-di-indonesia-sepanjang-2021?page=all.

S, Lidya Julitas. “Perburuan Dimulai! Ini Alasan NPWP & NIK KTP Bakal Digabung.” CNBC Indonesia, September 2020, https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20200903164140-4-184224/perburuan-dimulai-ini-alasan-npwp-nik-ktp-bakal-digabung.

The United State Social Security Administration. “History: Chronology.” SSA.gov, https://www.ssa.gov/history/1930.html.