Adaptation and Testing of the Complex Thinking-21 Scale Measurement Tool in Indonesia

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Apr 28, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28932/humanitas.v9i1.10714
Keywords:
Adaptasi, Alat Ukur, Complex Thinking Adaptation, Complex Thinking, Measurement

Main Article Content

Joti Cherryelle Rizky Yanto Soemantri
Program Studi Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
Muhammad Ihsan Fadhilah
Program Studi Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
Salma Dinna Amalia Putri
Program Studi Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
Yuda Akbari
Program Studi Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
Diah Zaleha Wyandini
Program Studi Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
Ghinaya Ummul Mukminin Hidayat
Program Studi Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

Complex Thinking is a cognitive process for understanding the relationship between unity and diversity. This process involves interdisciplinary skills that are important for students in the context of education and professional life preparation. However, until now, no adaptation of the Complex Thinking measurement tool has been conducted in Indonesia. Therefore, a study is needed to examine the validity and reliability of the Complex Thinking measurement tool adapted from Tobon (2021) in the Indonesian context. The Complex Thinking scale consists of 21 items with 5 dimensions: problem solving, critical analysis, metacognition, system analysis, and creativity. This study involved 203 active university students as participants. The results of the CFA test indicated that the model was fit, with goodness-of-fit indices of 0.067 (RMSEA), 0.062 (SRMR), and 0.994 (CFI). These findings confirm that the Complex Thinking measurement tool adapted into Indonesian has good validity. Furthermore, with a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.885, the measurement tool has proven to be reliable.

Downloads

Article Details

How to Cite
Soemantri, J. C. R. Y., Fadhilah, M. I., Putri, S. D. A., Akbari, Y., Wyandini, D. Z., & Hidayat, G. U. M. (2025). Adaptation and Testing of the Complex Thinking-21 Scale Measurement Tool in Indonesia. Humanitas (Jurnal Psikologi), 9(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.28932/humanitas.v9i1.10714
Issue
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Abimanyu, D., & Mahendra, I. (2024). Pengelompokkan Tingkat Penyakit Pada Setiap Daerah di Jawa Timur Menggunakan K-Means. Jurnal Ilmiah Statistika Dan Ekonometrika, 4(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.46306/bay.v4i1.79

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Fahmi, A. (2019). Kompleksitas berpikir dan problem solving dalam pendidikan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpi.2019.05.02.123

Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: (and Sex and Drugs and Rock “n” Roll) (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015). Methodological issues in qualitative and quantitative research on resilience and culture. In L. Theron, M. Ungar, & L. Liebenberg (Eds.), Youth resilience and culture: Commonalities and complexities (pp. 189–201). New York, NY: Springe

Hidayat, E. (2021). Kompetensi berpikir kompleks sebagai prediktor sukses di dunia kerja. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan, 7(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.2223/jmp.2021.07.02.089

Koerber, S., & Osterhaus, C. (2019). Individual differences in early scientific thinking: assessment, cognitive influences, and their relevance for science learning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 20(4), 510–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1620232

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2

Nurjaman, A. (2021). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam melalui implementasi desain pembelajaran "Assure". Penerbit Adab.

Pangestu, M. A. D., & Muhammad, A. (2022). Analisis faktor the brief jail mental health screen versi bahasa indonesia dengan Metode Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 5(4), 424-437. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v5i4.2784

Silva Pacheco, C., & Iturra Herrera, C. (2021). A conceptual proposal and operational definitions of the cognitive processes of complex thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2021.100794

Siregar, A. akta P., Mustapa Khamal Rokan, & Budi Harianto. (2023). Pengawasan (Monitoring) Sebagai Upaya Dalam Pencegahan Pembiayaan Murabahah Bermasalah. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 5, 968–973. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i3.697

Sulistiyo, H., & Ghozali, I. (2017). The role of religious control in dysfunctional audit behavior: An empirical study of auditors of public accounting firm in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Business Research, 33(5), 1047-1058. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268105729.pdf.

Susanto, B. (2020). Adaptasi terhadap perubahan dalam pendidikan tinggi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 45–58.

https://doi.org/10.5678/jip.2020.06.01.045

Wals, A. E. J., & Benavot, A. (2017). Addressing the challenges of sustainability through education. Journal of Environmental Education.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12250

Wulandari, D. (2017). Pembelajaran interdisipliner melalui pendekatan berpikir kompleks. Jurnal Interdisipliner Pendidikan, 3(4), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1112/jip.2017.03.04.101

Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Kruyen, P. (2018). Short scales–Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(8), 716-726.