Initial Development and Validation of the Student Engagement Scale | Humanitas (Jurnal Psikologi)

background: #1abc9c;

PDF (English)

Diterbitkan: Aug 29, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.28932/humanitas.v10i2.15257

Kata Kunci:

student engagement scale, confirmatory factor analysis, scale validation, psychometric properties student engagement scale, analisis faktor konfirmatori, validasi skala, properti psikometri

Chandra Yudistira Purnama

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Indonesia

Inggrit Rochmat Ayu Renjani

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Indonesia

Luthfiyah Rizki Fadhilah

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Indonesia

Nafisa Yunita Amalia

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Indonesia

Raisa Nur Fajri Maulida

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Indonesia

Detri Sefianmi

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Indonesia

Abstrak

Keterlibatan mahasiswa krusial bagi keberhasilan akademik, namun pengukurannya di Indonesia sering mengabaikan keterlibatan proaktif atau agentik. Penelitian ini bertujuan memvalidasi alat ukur Student Engagement Scale (SES) dengan kerangka empat dimensi (perilaku, emosional, kognitif, dan agentik) pada konteks mahasiswa. Menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, data dievaluasi dari 418 mahasiswa perguruan tinggi yang direkrut melalui teknik convenience sampling. Pengujian psikometri mencakup validitas isi, proses respons, struktur internal (Confirmatory Factor Analysis), serta pengujian reliabilitas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan 40 butir pernyataan final memiliki validitas konvergen yang ideal (SLF ≥ 0,50; AVE > 0,50). Model pengukuran empat dimensi terbukti sangat selaras dengan data empiris (Chi-square=0,202; RMSEA=0,010; CFI=0,957; TLI=0,954; SRMR=0,036) dan sangat andal (ω=0,8354; α=0,8399). Keterbatasan studi ini adalah terbatasnya pengambilan sampel pada satu institusi, pengumpulan bukti based on test response terbatas pada uji keterbacaan dan belum dilakukannya pengujian validitas kriteria eksternal. Secara keseluruhan SES versi Indonesia merupakan instrumen yang valid dan reliabel. Penelitian mendatang disarankan menerapkan probability sampling lintas Universitas serta menguji validitas prediktif instrumen terhadap indikator eksternal.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Cara Mengutip

Purnama, C. Y., Renjani, I. R. A. ., Fadhilah, L. R. ., Amalia, N. Y. ., Maulida, R. N. F. ., & Sefianmi, D. . (2026). Initial Development and Validation of the Student Engagement Scale. Humanitas (Jurnal Psikologi), 10(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.28932/humanitas.v10i2.15257

Terbitan

Vol 10 No 2 (2026)

Bagian

Articles

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Referensi

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Anunciação, L. (2018). An Overview of the History and Methodological Aspects of Psychometrics. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/mtfjy

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Dalimunthe, M. B., Adriani, D., Hasibuan, S. A., Manik, M. F., Harahap, R. K., & Amelia. (2026). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Dan Kepercayaan Diri Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 14(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jupe.v14n2.p237-245

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

DeMars, C. E. (2018). Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory. In The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing (pp. 49–73). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch2

Fitriyah, A. L., & Khotimah, S. K. (2025). Student Engagement pada Siswa MTsN yang Tinggal di Pondok Pesantren: Kontribusi Self Efficacy dan Iklim Sekolah. Jurnal Psikologi Islam, 10(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.47399/jpi.v10i2.337

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516061

Goss-Sampson, M. A. (2025). Statistical Analysis In Jasp A Guide For Students (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9980744

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2022). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=PONXEAAAQBAJ

Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

Heilporn, G., Raynault, A., & Frenette, É. (2024). Student engagement in a higher education course: A multidimensional scale for different course modalities. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100794

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Irwing, P., & Hughes, D. J. (2018). Test Development. In The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing (pp. 1–47). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch1

Iswinarti, I., & Surahman, S. (2022). Meningkatkan Engagement pada Siswa melalui Variabel Emosi: Tinjauan Sistematik. Buletin Psikologi, 30(2), 282. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.54355

Kelley, K., & Lai, K. (2018). Sample Size Planning for Confirmatory Factor Models. In The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing (pp. 113–138). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch5

Komussudin, A. (2021). Hubungan Student Engagement dengan Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa STIT At-Taqwa Ciparay Bandung. Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 2(2), 2721–2246.

Korhonen, V., Mattsson, M., Inkinen, M., & Toom, A. (2019). Understanding the multidimensional nature of student engagement during the first year of higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01056

Morrison, K. M., & Embretson, S. (2018). Item Generation. In The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing (pp. 75–94). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch3

Mulaik, S. A. (2018). Fundamentals of Common Factor Analysis. In The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing (pp. 209–251). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch8

Nachbauer, M. (2024). How schools affect equity in education: Teaching factors and extended day programs associated with average achievement and socioeconomic achievement gaps. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101367

Nurhaliza, T., Susanti, C., Pratiwi, I. T., Saka, F., & Yanuarsari, R. (2026). Eksplorasi Motivasi dan Hambatan belajar Mahasiswa Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Islam Nusantara Bandung. MARAS : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 4(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.60126/maras.v4i1.1436

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual website. Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452

Papageorgiou, E., Wong, J., Liu, Q., Khalil, M., & Cabo, A. J. (2025). A Systematic Review on Student Engagement in Undergraduate Mathematics: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Learning Outcomes. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 37, Number 3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10046-y

Putri, C., Kusumapratiwi, K., & Meilinda, P. (2024). Studi Deskriptif School Engagement pada Siswa SMK “X” di Kota Bandung. JIPSI: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 6(1), 62–70.

Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2008). Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the Glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z

Rina Miftakhi, D., Handayani, T., & Rina Priyani Mirsa, N. (2026). Student Learning Engagement Among First-Semester Students: Implications For Educational Management. ACADEMIA: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Akademik, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.51878/educational.v6i2.10683

Sakinah, S., Primana, L., Aurelian, E. S., & Kusumadewi, K. D. (2023). Agentic Engagement Peserta Didik Selama Pembelajaran Daring: Pengaruh Motivasi Intrinsik dan Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support. Jurnal Psikologi Sains & Profesi, 7(1), 57–68. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/jpsp/

Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2014). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14047-013

Utami, R. A., & Kurniawati, F. (2024). Agentic Engagement in Education: A Systematic Review of its Characteristics, Factors, and Impacts (2011–2024). KONSELOR, 13(4), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.24036/02024134104-0-86

Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-Type Scale Response Anchors.

Waruwu, R., & Waruwu, Y. (2024). Hubungan Antara Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa. IDENTIK: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, Pendidikan Dan Teknik, 1(3), 83–88.

Widyanti, N., Suhadianto, S., & Pratikto, H. (2026). Goal Orientation dan Student Engagement pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 5(1), 3273–3279. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i1.6007

Mendenhall, W. (2011). Elementary Survey Sampling (Seven Edit). Cencage Learning.

Yulianti, H., & Pebrianti, A. (2026). Analisis Tingkat Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Perkuliahan. In Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (Vol. 6, Number 1).

Ziegler, M. (2020). Psychological Test Adaptation and Development – How Papers Are Structured and Why. In Psychological Test Adaptation and Development (Vol. 1, Number 1, pp. 3–11). Hogrefe Publishing GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000002