Evaluation of Interior Design Learning Curriculum for the 2017 Academic Year Based on Graduates’ Performances in Professional Field (Case Study: ITENAS Interior Design Graduates Year 2016-2018)

Main Article Content

Putri Nur Ashri
Andriyanto Wibisono

Abstract

Interior design education has a critical role in creating competent graduates, specifically in the scope of professional interior design, who answer the problems of community needs through quality design ideas. Educational institutions need to ensure that the learning curriculum implemented can produce competent graduates following learning outcomes. ITENAS Interior Design, as one of the best interior design educational institutions in Bandung, plays a significant role in creating competent graduates who improve the community's quality of life and the residential environment. This sequential explanatory research evaluates the ITENAS Interior Design learning curriculum by assessing the performance of graduates in the Interior Design profession based on the educational curriculum components implemented during the study using a comparative descriptive approach. Overall, the Interior Design learning curriculum for the 2017 Academic Year of ITENAS does not meet the 'excellent' or very effective. The research results revealed that [1] ID ITENAS graduates from the 2016-2018 class had the best assessment in terms of attitude (89%) and could be further improved in terms of stance and independence, [2] The graduates' knowledge was considered to be quite good (66%) though the limitations are apparent from the aspect of technical problems and material treatments. [3] Lack of experience with real problems and a short work period means that graduates still need regular guidance, resulting in General Skills and Specific Skills scores being in the lowest positions (55% and 53%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ashri, P. N., & Wibisono, A. (2024). Evaluation of Interior Design Learning Curriculum for the 2017 Academic Year Based on Graduates’ Performances in Professional Field (Case Study: ITENAS Interior Design Graduates Year 2016-2018). Serat Rupa: Journal of Design, 8(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.28932/srjd.v8i2.8141
Section
Articles

References

Ambarwati, D. R. S. (2008). Antara desain interior dan dekorasi interior sebuat kajian kompartif. Lintas Ruang, 2(3), 53-62.

Buku kurikulum Desain Interior ITENAS 2017, (2017).

Fakultas Arsitektur dan Desain ITENAS (2024). Diakses tanggal Januari 1 from www.itenas.ac.id

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4 ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8 ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Furchan, A., Muhaimin, Maimun, A., & Abdushomad, A. (2005). Pengembangan kurikulum berbasis kompetensi di perguruan tinggi agama Islam. Pustaka Belajar.

Hernecheck, P. J., Rettig, K. D., & Sherman, M. R. (2008). Professional viewpoints of competencies for interior design entry-level positions. Journal of Interior Design 9(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.1983.tb00505.x

Junaidi, A. (2020). Panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di Era Industri 4.0 untuk mendukung Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi

Justan, R., Margiono, Aziz, A., & Sumiati. (2024). Penelitian kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Ulil Albab: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(2), 253-264.

Kartowagiran, B. (2013). Evaluasi dan pengembangan kurikulum. In Workshop evaluasi kurikulum STAB N Raden WIjaya.

koleksi foto Desain Interior ITENAS. (2024, 26 Mei 2024).

Mulyasa, H. E. (2012). Manajemen PAUD. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nchiehanie. (2024, 26 April 2024). Open Kampus Itenas Bandung 2024. Diakses tanggal Juni 1 from https://www.nchiehanie.com/open-kampus-itenas-bandung-2024/

Okeke, F. O., Onoh, S., & Obi, N. (2019). Architecture of interior; the role and human perception of art and artifact. International Journal of Engineering & Scientific Research, 7(2), 31-46.

Peningkatan mutu perguruan tinggi melalui tracer study. (2023). LLDIKTI3 KEMENDIKBUD. Diakses tanggal Maret 28 from https://lldikti3.kemdikbud.go.id/v6/2023/03/peningkatan-mutu-perguruan-tinggi-melalui-tracer-study/

Safitri, R. (2018). Strategi dan orientasi pembelajaran gambar teknik ber-orientasi keprofesian desain interior. Jurnal ATRAT, 6(1), 49-57.

Tarver, E. (2013). What I Wish I Knew [Master degree, Florida State University]. http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-7625

Tovey, M. (2015). Developments in design pedagogy. International conference on engineering and product design education, University of Loughborough, United Kingdom.

Triatmodjo, S. (2014). Metode pembelajaran desain interior berbasis kelas studio. Prosiding Seminar Akademik Fakultas Seni Rupa Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta 2014 Kajian Audiens dan Pendidikan Seni Pengalaman Resepsi Atas Model Struktural, Kultural, dan Strukturasi

Wardani, L. K. (2003). Berpikir kritis kreatif (sebuah model pendidikan di bidang desain interior). Dimensi Interior, 2(1), 97-111.

Widia. E (2023). Wawancara mendalam terkait Buku Kurikulum Pendidikan Desain Interior ITENAS tahun ajaran 2017 (Putri Nur Ashri), (2023).